Yesterday Derek Jeter got his 3000th hit which just happened to be a home run. He was only the second player to achieve that mark with a dinger, the other being Wade Boggs. When a ballplayer’s milestone hit just happens to be a long tater it creates something of a logistical problem; a problem that leads to anything from an informal negotiation to a court battle.
There was a time when a fan would settle for a short meet and greet with the player and an autograph or two in exchange for a home run ball. That sort of behavior is now frowned upon. Nowadays it’s expected that the fan will enter into hard negotiations with the player, the team or both. Shockingly (he said with tongue firmly in cheek) a cottage industry has developed around home run balls. Called ball hawking it is capitalism on steroids, pun intended. In simple terms the ball hawk snags the ball and then tries to take the player to the cleaners (Yes I know what you’re going to say and I’ll take that up later).
A few cases in point here. In 2008, A’s rookie Carlos Gonzalez hit his first major league homer. A ball hawk named Tom Snyder caught the ball and asked for a jersey and two signed bats. The A’s rejected the offer saying that uniforms take too long to replace. So in what I would consider a bizarre bit of negotiating, Snyder asked for $10,000 which the A’s also rejected. Snyder left with the ball and Gonzalez probably figured his souvenir 1st home run ball was gone. Not so, as Snyder traded the ball a week later for a signed photo with Gonzalez (a fair deal he should have taken in the first place). The “gentleman” who caught Ken Griffey’s 600th home run ball asked for, as Griffey put it, “a few things that were out of hand.” The imagination sort of reels over what “out of hand” means. Griffey never got that ball which eventually sold for $42,000 at an auction. The stories about the McGwire and Bonds “record breaking” home run balls are now legend. McGwire’s 70th in the ’98 season sold for $3 million and the Bonds 73rd single season ball went to court over who actually caught the ball.
Returning to Jeter’s 3000th; it was caught by a fellow named Christian Lopez. According to the folks who are supposed to be experts in the matter, the ball would be worth about $250,000. As the ball sailed over the fence the Yankee brass were probably opening the safe and pulling out the checkbook. Lopez was located and asked his price. Nothing; Lopez wanted nothing. Well the Yankees weren’t going to accept an outrageous offer like that so they gave Lopez four front-row Legends seats for the remainder of the season, including the playoffs and a gaggle of signed Jeter memorabilia. In addition he had his photo taken with Jeter and met with Reggie Jackson and other Yankee stars (and I would imagine, got their autographs as well).
Now, back to that “cleaners” thing. Yeah, yeah I know, Jeter’s salary will average $16 million dollars over this season and the next two, and the Yankees are one of the richest franchises in sports, so between the two a couple hundred thousand is nothing.
A quick review of the comments section of any article on Lopez/Jeter says that in the eyes of many of his fellow Americans, Lopez is a bloody fool. A few choice samples from Yahoo Sports for your reading pleasure:
“What a fool!!!!! He looks like he eats a lot. Will regret that he didn’t take the money.”
“Christian did a STUPID thing, nothing admirable about it. His girlfriend should dump him.”
“The right thing was to get paid so your family will be set....just sayin”
And here’s one of my favorites, “All you people who talk about morality, integrity, the right thing to do, etc. when it comes to this make me sick. Since when does anybody who catches a ball have a moral obligation to return it?”
A couple of thoughts. To be fair, a number of commenters commended Lopez for what he did, citing integrity, moral obligation and honesty. None of those really apply here. The ball was not stolen property. According to Major League Baseball rules, the ball belonged to Lopez free and clear so there was no compelling reason, legal or moral to give the ball to Jeter. So why did he do it? I would like to think it’s because he’s a good guy. I also would like to think that I would do pretty much the same thing. I’ve often posed that same question to myself and my answer has always been that I would probably ask for an autographed ball and an autographed picture of me with the player. And I think that’s a fair deal. As a baseball fan those would be some nice mementoes for the mantle. I seriously could not see myself asking for a horse choking bankroll. It isn’t in my makeup and apparently it isn’t in Lopez either and if that makes us chumps then fine, we’re chumps.
As it worked out, in my opinion anyway, Lopez got a pretty nice little package. Had he gone into a hardball negotiation session, I doubt that he would have been offered that deal and may have ended up settling for less. He could also have opted to auction the ball. As to the comment that Lopez’s girlfriend should dump him, it’s quite likely that the quality that made him give the ball to Jeter is just what she is looking for in a mate. Maybe she just isn’t in to opportunists.
This story might also say something about Derek Jeter. With the possible exception of some Red Sox and Mets fans Jeter is seen as one of the classiest guys in sports. A milestone hit by A-Rod, or the aforementioned Bonds might not invite the kindness shown by Lopez.
And so this leads me to a final comment on the whole affair. In a short time Derek Jeter will retire and when he does it will leave one less in a meager pool of classy athletes who would invite the kind of goodwill shown by Christian Lopez.
How appropriate that the yahoos and jeeters ragging on Lopez were to be found on Yahoo sports. The decline of civility and proper discourse written for all to see. The one calling him a fool and commenting that Lopez apparently eats a lot. The truly idiotic comment that, because what Lopez did was stupid and not admirable, his girlfriend should dump him. The comment that the "right thing" was to get paid for the ball.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that integrity, moral obligation, and honesty are not applicable in this case. The main issue, I think, is not what is right and what is wrong. The issue is what's right for an individual. Lopez thought it was right to return the ball to Jeter because of what a great career he has had. For all those who disagree with Lopez' decision and all the ball hawks you mentioned, what is right is to get as much money as you can whenever you can, regardless of the circumstances.
You said you've asked yourself if you would do as Lopez did. I know you would and am pretty certain I would also. It's a shame that in our deteriorating society, actions such as that taken by Lopez are seen as those of a chump.
My final comment echoes yours, questioning whether A-Rod or Barry Bonds would bring forth the kindness shown by Lopez. Bonds might. That is not a reflection on him, for I still believe him to be a swine, but is a reflection on the slavish devotion many Giants fans still have for Bonds. Jeter is a class act, one of the few players of whom I could say was worth every penny he was paid.