Second Part in a Series
We Don't Insure a Burning House
We Don't Insure a Burning House
I clearly recall the interview that I heard on NPR prior to the 2008 presidential election. A woman described her efforts to find insurance when she was pregnant. The charming response from one agent was, "We don't insure a burning house." By good fortune or the grace of God, her job transferred her to Germany where she immediately was accepted into the health care system and received prenatal and postnatal care.
In
my last post I described the opinions of some influential Americans;
politicians, candidates, pundits and media personalities, on the subject of
health care. All oppose a national
health care system and support the idea of keeping health insurance in
the hands of private insurance companies. And while some of these folks have been eliminated from the electoral contest their opinions and ideas live on.
I
referenced statements by these individuals expressing opinions; that insurance
companies should be allowed to charge for preexisting conditions or even completely
deny coverage for preexisting conditions; that compare health insurance to auto and
homeowners insurance; that people in America don’t die for lack of insurance; and that
everyone has access to health care in the form of the emergency room.
What
is so striking about all of the statements by these individuals is that they
reveal a broad disconnect with mainstream America and a shocking disdain
for their fellow citizens.
Rick
Santorum’s patronizing comments comparing health insurance to car insurance reveals a man who is clearly out of touch with the realities of the middle class.
In comparing auto insurance to health insurance he suggested that people
not charge routine bills to insurance; if you charge your oil change and gas bills to auto
insurance you’ll pay higher premiums just as you would if you claim well baby
visits. Well Mr. Santorum, if I
submitted a 40 dollar oil change bill or my gas receipt to State Farm they
would invite me to, as my dad used to say, go whistle down a well, because as
we all know, car insurance doesn’t cover maintenance; it is for, so called
catastrophic incidents. Health insurance
does and should cover routine visits. It encourages routine visits because routine checkups reduce the chance of
catastrophic illness and their much higher costs down the road – it’s good
business. It seems that Mr. Santorum has never had to cheapen himself by having to use an HMO because he clearly doesn't know how they work. HMOs don't give you the option of what you pay for and what you claim. Your plan determines what services you pay for and how much you pay. For instance, when a condition that I had
required weekly blood draws I was not charged for these visits; they were part
of the plan. The good folks at Kaiser
wouldn’t have taken my money even at my insistence. We can only assume that Mr. Santorum has a lackey
to handle all of the irksome plebian details that he can’t be troubled with and
apparently doesn’t understand. The problem with that assumption is that it's wrong and this is what's troubling. Rick Sanotorum knows full well how auto insurance works and how an HMO functions; he isn't an idiot. He simply thinks that the people who's votes he was courting are idiots.
Santorum “is okay” with paying
extra for his child’s preexisting condition.
I’ve no doubt of that since he is worth over a million dollars and
largely due to his status as a former senator has no trouble securing lucrative
speaking engagements and high paying jobs.
Mr. Santorum couldn’t relate at all to my friend Scott who has had
severe back problems for decades that have required major spinal surgeries; a preexisting condition if there ever was one.
Scott has no illusions of ever being able to retire. Whatever money he has in the bank is being
inexorably consumed to pay insurance coverage that rivals his monthly rent. Being bled dry he is finding that he may no longer be able to live in the Bay Area where he has spent nearly his entire life. And so in middle age he finds himself nearly disabled and faced with the probablility of having to relocate and start all over again.
And
while Santorum thinks insurance companies should charge extra for preexisting
conditions, Mike Huckabee thinks insurance companies should be able to deny
coverage for people with preexisting conditions. While Santorum compared human health to cars,
Huckabee comparison of people to possessions was to compare health insurance to
home insurance; as in why would an insurance company cover a home that has
burned down.
So what is a preexisting condition? A preexisting condition is inscrutable; its a mystery; a ghost. I asked some family and friends to describe a preexisting condition. My wife offered her bouts with cancer. Someone else mentioned diabetes. Another mentioned emphysema. I would say my past episodes of atrial fibrillation. All of these seem like reasonable definitions of preexisting conditions. The problem is that there is no definition of a preexisting condition. In case you didn’t get that let me put it this way; an insurance company can determine anything to be a preexisting condition. So in theory a trip to the dermatologist for a case of adolescent acne could haunt you some years later.
So what is a preexisting condition? A preexisting condition is inscrutable; its a mystery; a ghost. I asked some family and friends to describe a preexisting condition. My wife offered her bouts with cancer. Someone else mentioned diabetes. Another mentioned emphysema. I would say my past episodes of atrial fibrillation. All of these seem like reasonable definitions of preexisting conditions. The problem is that there is no definition of a preexisting condition. In case you didn’t get that let me put it this way; an insurance company can determine anything to be a preexisting condition. So in theory a trip to the dermatologist for a case of adolescent acne could haunt you some years later.
When
she was in high school, my friend Scott’s daughter went to the family physician
complaining of minor knee pain. Nothing
ever came of it except that now as a healthy young woman in her mid-twenties
she has been denied coverage for a preexisting knee condition. I have a number of friends who are runners; healthy folks with excellent
blood pressure, heart rates in the 50’s and great lung capacities. They’ve probably also had a few visits to the
orthopedist for anything from mild knee pain (see Scott’s daughter above) to
shin splints, to tendonitis to stress fractures; all potential preexisting
conditions that could preclude them from getting coverage if they ever have to
get insurance on their own. These runners, folks who pride themselves on their healthy habit could conceivably have reams of preexisting condition files as thick as those of a lifelong smoker. I
can imagine very few people who don’t have something in their medical history
that can be described as preexisting.
Think about it. Do you have a skeleton in your health closet that broke a bone once upon a time?
In a sorry, ironic sense Santorum's and Huckabee's comparisons carry some validity. How many of us have decided against making a claim against our homeowner's insurance because we were afraid that we might get dropped? Or just leave that dent on the front fender so the auto rate won't get raised. And so when we realize that anything can be a preexisting condition do we limp around on that swollen ankle instead of having the doctor look at it for fear that it might put a flag in the medical files? As my wife often asks rhetorically, "Why do we even have insurance if we're afraid to file a claim?"
In a sorry, ironic sense Santorum's and Huckabee's comparisons carry some validity. How many of us have decided against making a claim against our homeowner's insurance because we were afraid that we might get dropped? Or just leave that dent on the front fender so the auto rate won't get raised. And so when we realize that anything can be a preexisting condition do we limp around on that swollen ankle instead of having the doctor look at it for fear that it might put a flag in the medical files? As my wife often asks rhetorically, "Why do we even have insurance if we're afraid to file a claim?"
According
to the website Health Care.gov, “There is
no one definition of a pre-existing condition.
Health insurance issuers and employer plans use different
definitions. Depending upon your
condition, you may be denied coverage or charged a higher premium. Some plans consider acne, asthma or high
blood pressure a pre-existing condition.
Others narrow the definition of pre-existing conditions to cancer or
diabetes. Sometimes you might have
totally recovered from a condition – like a past bout with depression – and it
will still count against you.”
And so let's extrapolate Huckabee’s analogy to home owner’s insurance and the fact that anything can be a preesisting condition. I suppose that you might
understand if a carrier refused to cover your burned out hulk of a home, but you would
probably find yourself flabbergasted if that carrier refused to insure your
home because of a creaky door or a running toilet; your home’s preexisting
conditions. What exactly does Mr. Huckabee think that people with preexisting health conditions are supposed to do? Put into action his idea leaves the diabetic without insulin and as a result leaves him with no choice but to die; and decrease the surplus population.
And to think that this man is supposed to be a minister.
That's a great comment from Cora. People can have health insurance and still feel intimidated by the claim processing. I think you did a very nice job of articulating what navigating the health care/insurance system can be. Many in this country feel that nothing is amiss. They obviously have never dealt with that maze.
ReplyDeleteSome who read this might snarl "That sumbitch is advocating socialism". No, I'm not. Blue Cross, Blue Shield (I once bitterly referred to them as No Shield), et al. are registered as non-profit organizations. Most people who get health insurance through their employers don't use it enough to cause the insurance company a loss.
Pre-existing conditions are about as hard to define as beauty. The difference is that beauty isn't penalized. Again, I don't necessarily advocate a socialist approach to fixing our health care system. That system is irrevocably broken, replace it with something that makes sense and works.
People who are against such measures often say that they don't want their taxes raised. I agree with them, but only if their taxes are being spent wisely. Since this is often not the case, there may be a need to raise taxes. How about doing it this way; eliminate personal income tax and tax consumption.
If the income tax was eliminated, this country could apportion taxes properly, using taxes taken from usage rather than income. If we can't do our tax collection system properly. then we're totally rogered!
Okay, cynical Craig here - again. Paul, you and millions like you are too forgiving and Polly Anna regards this particular political peccadillo concerning health insurance. A story for illustration. As a teen, my father lived in Detroit (go Giants) and worked summers on a ferry boat. They routinely had groups rent the boat for tours/parties. Among his jobs was to work the buffet. The 'buffet' consisted of hot coffee and sandwiches. Three choices were offered. Ham sandwiches, cheese sandwiches, and ham and cheese sandwiches. A local Jewish group rented the boat. An elderly gentleman walked up to the buffet, pointed to a ham sandwich and demanded loudly, "I'll have a cheese sandwich." My father corrected him, pointing to the cheese sandwiches, "No, sir, that's the cheese sandwich. You're pointing to the ham sandwich." Now more loudly and with anger the gentleman pointed closer to a ham sandwich and repeated, "I said I'll have a CHEESE sandwich." Dad gave him what he pointed to and left the truth to take care of itself. The point is, the man could not, by religious constraint, eat ham, but did not want cheese. So, he transfigured the ham to cheese and was covered.
ReplyDeleteThe republicans do not think for a second quality health care can be obtained from ER's or that people do not deserve adequate medical coverage. They simply don't want to force their country-club buddies and major contributors to lose a dime.. So, terrible health care, like the ham sandwich, becomes the perfect selection.
To be fair, I do not blame the insurance companies. They are profit driven breasts without souls. Of course they don't want to pay-out, they want to keep every dolar for themselves. The problem of health care will only be solved when national health insurance modeled on Kaiser Permanente is adopted. Such a system will never be adopted. The problem will never be resolved. Period.
Why can't we all bond-together and be well? The stake-holders - doctors, insurance companies and large employer - have too much to lose. I could bore you all day with stories of wicked insurers torturing patient and wicked doctors raping people's wallet to the peril of their well-being. Elected official MUST be re-elected, right? So they need beacoup buck. I have never given any of them a cent. Even if I dug-deep and raided the 401k, the best I could do would be grains of sand added to the beach of their war-chests.
So please don't try to logically pick-apart or rebut their words. They don't believe their own words, but they have to say something. So, they point to ham and say it's cheese.
All this only reinforces the retirement plan I espouse to my wife. I say I want to buy a cave, cover the opening with rocks and brush, and only come out once a year for supplies.