There’s been an awful lot of sniping going on surrounding
the movie American Sniper, the story of Chris Kyle based on Kyle’s memoir of
the same title. It’s an argument that
like damn near every argument in America these days, has no gray area, got
nasty from the start and spares neither the movie, its director Clint Eastwood,
the Iraq War, the book, nor Chris Kyle himself.
And like arguments in America it managed to go off the rails into wild
irrelevance. A prime example was Michael
Moore hauling Jesus into the donnybrook.
I saw the movie the weekend it
debuted and shortly afterwards I noticed all the hoo-haw that was hitting the
media. And so I decided to read the book
and a fair amount of articles in order to make up my own mind.
Let’s start with the reasonable observation that if you
go to the movies to get your history lessons then your knowledge of history is
pretty flawed. It seems damn near every
movie claims to be “based on a true story.”
Take a particular period, some characters real or fictional add some
events that may or may not have happened and for many you have history. The problem with this is that producers make
movies to make money and not to make historians. If you want to learn history then you’ll need
to do it the old fashioned way – read a book.
The movie takes a hell of a lot of license with the book,
starting with a scene of Kyle shooting a child who was in the process of the
throwing a grenade at an American patrol - this never happened. From there most of the combat scenes are a
series of events, most of them apparently fictionalized, which are, I imagine,
supposed to be an encompassing dramatized representation of Kyle’s four tours
of duty in Iraq.
Where book and movie find a more contiguous relationship
are in the descriptions of Kyle’s views on killing; the physical and emotional
scars that came from Kyle’s four tours and the strains that were placed on
Kyle, his wife Taya and their two children.
But even here, the book only grazes the problems that Kyle had when he
returned to the states. The movie
doesn’t touch on Kyle’s drinking problems or the many fights that he found
himself in which at one point he sees as a serious warning signal. The movie pays lip service to many of the
problems that Kyle began to notice during his final tour.
Wrote Kyle, “Things
seemed to go downhill in the few days after we got back from border
patrol. I couldn’t sleep, I felt very
jumpy. Extremely jumpy. And my blood pressure shot up again, even
higher than before. I felt like I was going to explode….I sweated buckets and
my hands would even shake. My face
pretty white to begin with became pale.
This might be a good place to add my own perspective of
the period. When the wars in Afghanistan
and Iraq were being contemplated I was less than enthusiastic. While I saw some measure of justification
about Afghanistan I’d studied the histories of British and Soviet failures in
that “graveyard of empires.” It was, I
thought, a place that would swallow us for a very long time before finally
regurgitating a worn out nation with nothing to show for the effort.
Iraq, I was
convinced, was foolish adventurism built on dubious claims at best and outright
lies at worst. No good could come of it. The power vacuum that was predicted came true
and now a larger part of the world is mired in ISIS. I remember clearly the day that the Iraq War
began. My son was away at college, my
wife was away on a trip somewhere and my daughter and I were at a local
restaurant having dinner. We were
sitting at Pear Street Bistro when the word went around the dining room that
the war had begun. I suppose that I muttered
something about Bush being a dumbass and then dug into my calamari. That moment it turned out would be the beginning
of my own personal apathy that would be the microcosm for an unconcerned
nation.
I should probably also mention that I don’t consider
Chris Kyle to be a hero. And that isn’t
to demean Chris Kyle. I don’t believe
that he wasn’t courageous or that he was any more flawed than any other
individual. No, the word “hero” is not
in my vocabulary. I’m not really sure
what a hero is. It’s a little word
that’s big in stature and thrown around loosely to describe anyone from a lotto
winner to a teacher to an athlete to an “American Idol” to a Medal of Honor
recipient.
The first significant shot came, not surprisingly Michael
Moore. Tweeted Moore, "My uncle
[was] killed by sniper in WW2. We were
taught snipers were cowards. Will shoot
you in the back. Snipers aren't heroes.”
Moore caught hell for it and then
reacted as if his tweet had nothing to do with Chris Kyle; as if the subject of
snipers just randomly popped into his head.
Not to be outdone, Max Blumenthal chimed in, comparing
Kyle to John Lee Malvo the DC sniper and calling Kyle a “mass murderer.” Blumenthal went on, “I haven’t seen American
Sniper, but correct me if I’m wrong: An occupier mows down faceless Iraqis but
the real victim is his anguished soul,”
Bill Maher, he of the permanent supercilious smirk joined
in, dubbing Kyle a “psychopath.”
The first problem is Blumenthal’s admission that he
hadn’t seen the movie but typical of 21st century journalism and
commentary that didn’t disqualify him from rendering a personal posthumous
attack on Chris Kyle himself. I’m going
to assume that he didn’t read Kyle’s book either and I’m also going to assume
that neither Moore nor Maher did any research beyond the film’s 30 second
trailer. Why would they? The stock in trade of partisan punditry is
sleight of truth and shoot first and then check the facts if you happen to get
called on them (or simply disappear and hope the fallout goes away). After all we can’t let any facts get in the
way of a good slander.
Why do I have a problem with these individuals? First of all I doubt their scholarship. They’ve put out the notion that the snipers
in Iraq were taking their high powered rifles and plinking at innocuous Iraqis
who were doing nothing more lethal than eating a Snickers bar or taking a shit. The fact is, the mission of these snipers was
to take a high position and provide over watch for American patrols. The victims were active combatants unseen by
troops on the ground while setting IEDs or preparing to ambush American
soldiers.
The bigger problem that I have is a criticism of the
movie that drifts over a line to personally attack Chris Kyle. A movie is just that, a movie. You like it or you don’t – no harm either
way. The attacks against Kyle, many with
little more homework than watching the trailer or parroting someone else’s
opinion are reminiscent of the reception that American soldiers received when
returning from Vietnam. Not surprisingly
this criticism comes from folks that have spent the last decade safely in the
good old US of A. Those who were combatants have a different view. Garret Reppenhagen a former sniper writing in
Salon takes on the movie for its narrow view of the war in Iraq and he also
takes on the war itself but he spares Kyle of any character attacks. He writes, “My war was completely
different than Chris Kyle’s war. That doesn’t mean his war is wrong, and
mine was right. But it does mean that no one experience is definitive.”
The movie has been criticized for steering clear of either
a moral or political statement on the Iraq War. It is from beginning to end just a war movie. There is no finale with the disillusion and
melancholy of other “statement” war movies like the classic Deer Hunter. And so without that moral scream the leap has
been made that American Sniper is a glorification. But again, American Sniper is just a
movie. And just as we shouldn’t be
getting our history lessons from movies we should also not look to movies for
moral direction. That comes from within,
as individuals and in this instance, as a nation. Before vilifying Chris Kyle maybe we should do
a review of what we were doing and where we all were, mentally and morally, as
individuals and as a nation since 9/11
We've been in Iraq for 12 years now and while a short
time ago in the pre-ISIS days it looked like we would finally be out the end no
longer seems to be in sight. Some of us,
me among them, saw the disaster in the making from the start (although we
weren't sure what form it would take) while others saw it as a crusade both
literally and figuratively.
The Bush Administration hit us with the hard sell on Iraq
and we bought it. We the people of the
United States of America acquiesced to the Iraq War. We acquiesced through The House and Senate
(including notable Democrats Feinstein, Biden, Reid, Kerry and Daschle). We whimpered a few protests, called Bush a
dumbass Texan and then we went back to Super Bowls, American Idol, and standing
in line for the latest IPhone. The war
ground on and on and on and as much of a dumbass as some took Bush for he was
smart enough to avoid making a two front war a burden on America – at least not
a burden that was noticeable. No
rationing, no taxes and no draft. As
long as you didn't have any skin in the game (or should I say flesh in the
game) in the form of actually serving or having family or friends serve, it was
all good.
And not very many Americans have had skin in that
game. In World War II, more than 12
percent of Americans served. In 1973,
after we’d extracted ourselves from Vietnam, the decision was made that
America’s defense would be shouldered by an all-volunteer army. And so Bush sent America to war in the Middle
East with a military that represented less than .5 percent of the
population. Unless you haven’t noticed, Americans
don’t worry themselves over small segments of society. We enjoyed a quiet dinner at home while we
watched a few minutes of tepid coverage on the news. Yeah the news; we had enough problems at home
what with a growing recession, mass murders, politicians emailing photos of
their privates and professional athletes making idiots of themselves. We were only slightly bothered by the
casualties and the broken men and women who returned from the Middle East. Compared with the war in Vietnam, the numbers
were paltry. And certainly we weren't
overly concerned about the civilian casualties.
We acquiesced with our thumbs up our collective national ass for years
and years and years. Hell, there were
times when the war garnered all the attention of a minor league hockey
game. The national yawn wasn't lost on
Chris Kyle when he came home between tours.
Wrote Taya Kyle (In the book American Sniper), “The first time Chris came home, he was
really disgusted with everything. With
America especially. In the car on the
way back to our house, we listened to the radio. People weren't talking about
the war; life went on as if nothing was happening in Iraq. ‘People are talking
about bullshit,’ he said.”
We continued to acquiesce by reelecting the man who
launched the adventure. Finally over
five years after it all started we elected a man who actually voted against the
Iraq War and proposed an exit. We
elected him over a ticket that exhibited all of the class and intellect of an
Adam Sandler character so it’s almost hard to say whether or not the election was
a statement against the war or the nation saying, “Oh hell no,” to the
unelectable pair..
In the more than a decade of warfare on two fronts I
don’t recall that the recruiting offices had ever closed up shop. And in all that time there were plenty of war
hawks pounding their chests, calling for war and shouting “Hooah” like the
soldiers they wanted to be but for the inconvenience of having to leave home
and hearth for the Iraqi desert. They
didn't do anything more dangerous than hit the paintball fields while Kyle and
comrades lived the shit. The brave boys
at home just got a big rush out of living the adventure vicariously.
And from the left?
Shit, from the left there was barely a whimper of protest. I know protests. I remember the Vietnam protests that brought
a president to his knees. But the left
of the 21st century roared like a little lost lamb. Lost in their sushi bars harrumphing on
social media and waiting for someone to hit the streets in protest. Well they’re still waiting. And now fifteen years later the left finds
itself scandalized, appalled and in a lather because a movie came out that
depicts an American soldier killing people.
Really? It took a fucking
movie? And to add to the left’s
consternation they found that Chris Kyle, in both book and movie, called the
Iraqis “savages”
Kyle may have been talking about combatants or Iraqis in
general, I frankly don’t know. He showed
no remorse for his kills (every one he claims is within the rules of engagement
(ROE) and clearly he got a rush out of combat. For all of that Kyle has been vilified by a
left that was too busy to put down their 8 dollar craft beer long enough to
figure out what the hell was going on.
And now they've brought out the pitchforks and torches. And for what?
Because he killed people? What in
the hell did everybody think was going on over there? I’m not quite sure what it is that folks
expect out of young men and women who serve in the armed forces and especially
those soldiers who see combat. Chris
Kyle was not unlike other soldiers. He
went into an elite military unit (a unit we praised for saving a ship’s captain
and for killing Bin Laden) that trained him to kill people in a war that we
agreed to, either implicitly or explicitly, and then ignored until it took a
movie to break the stupor.
By all accounts Kyle did what he was sent there to do and
he followed the rules of engagement that were given him. He was killing combatants and doing it quite
efficiently thank you. He gave us the
bang (no pun intended) for our taxpayer dollar. While he did four tours of duty we played
our own game of don’t ask – don’t tell.
We didn't bother to ask, so the government figured it didn't have to
tell. It was the perfect symbiotic relationship.
It’s disturbing to me that there are so many who are
quick to vilify and don’t bother to take the time to go any deeper than a
Hollywood production, a few hit pieces
on social media and some glib comments from the likes of Moore and Maher. Chris Kyle deserved better. He did our bidding and like many other
soldiers Kyle didn't come back undamaged.
He survived three gunshot wounds, two helicopter crashes, six IED
attacks and numerous surgeries (some to repair both knees damaged when a
concrete wall fell on his legs). He was
luckier than Marcus Luttrell another SEAL, he of Lone Survivor fame who was
also pilloried by the liberal media. In
Luttrell’s words, he was, “Shot, eleven (times) through-and-through [wounds]. Broken pelvis. Broken back. Shoulder was torn out. My knees were destroyed. Pretty severe facial damage. I bit my tongue
in half. My right hand was destroyed from my thumb over to my index finger.” You may not like their attitudes. You may not like their machismo or their
braggadocio or their pejoratives or their lack of remorse but they did what
they were asked to do. Had they not, it
might have been your son, your husband, your father, or your
friend conscripted to do the dirty work.
But then at that point the war would have magically shown up on everyone’s
radar as something that had to come to an end immediately if not sooner. Certainly before the draft notice called
little junior away from his college studies.
“One night a little
later on we were in an exhausting firefight.
Ten of us spent roughly forty-eight hours in the second story of an old,
abandoned brick building, fighting if hundred-degree-plus heat wearing full
armor. Bullets flew in, demolishing the
walls around us practically nonstop. The
only break we took was to reload….When the Marines came in to relieve us, they
found every man in the room slumped against a wall or collapsed on the
floor...”
~ Chris Kyle
Chris Kyle came back with the demons of war dancing in
his head. He finally found his peace by
helping the broken men and women who returned from fighting our war. How many of us lifted a finger for these folks
beyond writing a check or signing a petition or harrumphing indignantly when we
found out our wounded vets were being mistreated? In the end Kyle was allegedly shot by a
former Marine with PTSD who he was trying to help.
“When he got home,
it seemed to me Chris was so stressed he was numb to everything. It was hard for him to pinpoint how he felt
about anything. He was just wiped out and overwhelmed.” ~ Taya Kyle
Maybe some of the self-righteous outrage should be turned
inward. If you don’t like what Chris
Kyle did and what he stood for then perhaps you need to speak up and tell the
government and all of the business interests that our government whores for
that it isn't alright to piss off other nations by exploiting their people and
resources. And I mean really do
something besides posting silly memes and waxing all huffy on Facebook. Put your own skin in the game and work hard
for change.
We created Chris Kyle and Marcus Luttrell, the
warriors. We created them by allowing
wars of adventurism and dubious justification.
We put them in wheelchairs, prosthetics and coffins. We dug the dens that house the insidious
serpents that slither forth to torture their dreams. They are our sons and
daughters who do what we have neither the courage to take up nor the fortitude
to halt. They deserve better than to be
called “psychopaths” and “cowards” by the ignorant and the self-righteous.
You’ve opened it up for several discussions in this post. I’ll start with your starting point, history from a movie versus history from a book. I’ve yet to see a movie that was better than the book it was based on, especially those based loosely or otherwise on a true story. I didn’t see Monuments Men and don’t want to. The book was excellent. The author wrote so vividly that I saw what he depicted, so why bother with the movie? The parts of the book you quoted indicate that the book will show me more than the movie would.
ReplyDeleteChris Kyle wasn’t a hero. He was a guy who was trained to kill. Snipers are different from infantrymen. The infantryman is frequently in a kill or be killed situation. The sniper targets his victim often without the victim knowing it. Neither is any different from the bombardier on the Enola Gay, except that he killed more than 100,000 and almost all of them were civilians. They’re all trained to kill, making their targets die for their country before the shooter does.
I agree that the war in Iraq was foolish adventurism, which was to be expected from the fools in the presidential administration at that time. Iraq has been the war that won’t go away. There is less protest over it than Vietnam. It being fought by a volunteer army is a big difference from being fought by draftees dying in the jungles of Vietnam. There’s a feeling about those killed in action that they were there because they wanted to be, they volunteered for action. The guys killed in Vietnam always seemed to be the guy down the block whose greatest pleasure was being on his driveway working on his ’66 Mustang.
You wrote that Chris Kyle came back with the demons of war dancing in his head. It’s a wonder that everyone who does combat duty doesn’t come back with those demons. Maybe they do but have better luck fighting off those demons. Maybe this generation is different from the guys in WWII who came back from the war, had a home cooked meal, and then went out looking for a job or registered for college courses. One thing that isn’t different is that they both were involved in combat and saw more horror than they could have accurately imagined.
Your final two paragraphs make me think of the saying “if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem”. Voting in major elections is still way too low. It’s easier to reach out to elected officials than it was during the Vietnam war but how many people make that effort? It really is up to everyone to do something.
During Robert Kennedy’s 1968 presidential campaign, he did a speech in a Kansas university where most of his audience weren’t enthusiastically supportive. At one point, he talked about how there is no excuse for poverty in a country as wealthy as America. A student stood up and asked “Senator Kennedy, who do you think is going to pay for these social programs you talk about?” Kennedy responded “You are!” and, pointing to others in the audience, continued “You are, you are, and you are. It’s up to all of us because it is a national problem”.
Yes, we created the Chris Kyles by allowing our government to justify involvement in questionably wars. That involvement has to be fought by somebody, just as it has to be funded by somebody. The somebody doing the funding is the American taxpayer. The somebody doing the fighting is also a taxpayer. The difference is that the combatants won’t come back from their involvement emotionally and/or physically messed up.